I don't have any specific project in mind, but are there any limits on who can pick a given study in order to replicate it?
Or it is always a good idea that reproducibility should be performed by the person who has been working in the same field of study?
If this can be done by anyone, then how we can know/believe that they did the replication process in the right way, in other words they knew what they were doing, they had necessary/required technical background and they fully understood the problem/project.
Are there any ground rules in open science?
This post has been migrated from the Open Science private beta at StackExchange (A51.SE)